The law that makes Oregon unique is under threat
A coalition of farmers, environmentalists and others are pushing for protection of the state’s land use regulations

Protected: Jefferson County includes Mount Jefferson, Confederated Tribe of Warm Springs Indian Reservation, Metolius River, Black Butte, Suttle Lake, Lake Billy Chinook and Priday Agate Beds. Photo: Holden Films/Central Oregon LandWatch
By Kendra Chamberlain. February 10, 2026. With the suburban boom that followed World War II, Oregon farmland and other open spaces with mountain and ocean views, particularly in the Willamette Valley, began being bought up by developers and affluent families looking for investment and vacation properties.
Led by Gov. Tom McCall, conservationists mobilized a defense of the land. McCall famously spoke about the “shameless threat to our environment and to the whole quality of life—unfettered despoiling of the land” in a 1973 address to the state legislature.
Signed into law by McCall in 1973, Senate Bill 100 revised land-use policy in the state by creating the Land Conservation and Development Commission and putting limits on the types of development allowed on rural land. The bill’s primary goals were to protect farms and forests from the commercial blight that arose in states with less restrictive land use regulations, and curb leapfrog subdivisions and second homes scattered in forests and farmlands.
Now more than 50 years old, Senate Bill 100 has kept Oregon looking like Oregon, not California or Arizona, or even Texas or Ohio.
Opponents have long challenged Oregon’s unique land use law, which has held a tense line between rural landscapes and urban development.
Now, opposition has become so formidable that farmers and conservationists across the state are sounding an alarm and calling for the protection the state’s visionary land use planning laws.
This month, 53 organizations signed a letter addressed to state lawmakers and Gov. Tina Kotek as the state legislature begins its 2026 session. Signatories include conservation groups like Bird Alliance of Oregon and WaterWatch of Oregon, and agricultural groups such as Oregon Agricultural Trust and American Farmland Trust.
“Why spend years building up a farm if a developer can take over the land around yours and put up a subdivision or retail store or strip mall?” said Susan Hess, founder and publisher emeritus of Columbia Insight, which is not a signatory to the letter.
“The last crop you’ll ever plant is a subdivision,” said longtime cherry orchardist and Columbia Insight board member Bob Bailey.

Crook County: Central Oregon’s rural lands are home to iconic vistas, high desert ecosystems and a bustling agricultural economy. Can it stay that way? Photo: Ryder Redfield/Central Oregon LandWatch
Rory Isbell, staff attorney at Central Oregon LandWatch, says the state’s land use law has also protected Oregon’s natural resources.
“We at LandWatch are big believers of the land use system and all the benefits it provides for the state,” Isbell told Columbia Insight.
LandWatch, along with 1000 Friends of Oregon, a group McCall helped establish, spearheaded the letter.
Isbell said lawmakers in the state capital have recently introduced a spate of bills that seek to undermine the state’s system in favor of development.
“It seems like every year for the past several years, we’ve seen an accelerating number of proposals coming out of Salem and legislative sessions that would really weaken the land use system,” said Isbell.
The Oregon legislature will consider a handful of bills this year that would expand urban growth boundaries in some areas and open farmland to other uses.
The letter highlights a “deep concern about escalating threats to [land use planning] integrity emerging from Salem.”
“Few public policy frameworks have served our state so well, for so long, and with such broad benefits,” the letter reads. “While other Western states have been marred by unchecked or unplanned development, Oregon’s program provides a balance that has led to livable cities and towns, constrained rural sprawl, and limited climate pollution—all while preserving the farms, forests, and open spaces that sustain our economies, ecosystems, and communities.”













