Oregon’s double-agent agency, OFRI, close to facing its full fate in the House
Taxpayers funded it for 30 years as a forestry public education service. House Bill 2357 fells the Oregon Forest Resources Institute as a timber industry lobbyist hiding in plain sight

Clear cut: The Oregon Legislature is on the verge of slashing the Oregon Forest Resources Institute. Photo by Calibas/Wikicommons
By Jordan Rane. May 26, 2021. Calling out a state government agency for being less than effective is hardly breaking news. A far bigger deal: putting one on the legislative stand for being extremely effective—at performing the opposite of its taxpayer-funded purpose.
“Like many Oregonians, I read last year’s OPB and ProPublica investigative reporting on the Oregon Forest Resources Institute, and honestly I was outraged,” posted Rep. Andrea Salinas (D-Lake Oswego) on a Facebook forum. “We know enough about OFRI’s inappropriate and unethical behavior to take action now.”
Earlier this year, Salinas drafted HB 2357, a bill aiming to eliminate the Oregon Forest Resources Institute (OFRI) entirely.
MORE: SDS Lumber sale: While locals fret, companies evade questions
The longstanding outreach agency launched by the Oregon Legislature in 1991 was created to “advance public understanding of forests, forest management and forest products, and encourage sustainable forestry through landowner education,” according to OFRI’s own mission statement.
Recent independent investigations into OFRI—including a damning 2020 report from The Oregonian and OPB entitled “What happened when a public institute became a de facto lobbying arm of the timber industry”—have exposed years of illegal lobbying by the ostensibly educational agency, as well as fueling misleading advertising and political attack ads, and muffling legitimate scientific research.

Forest thump: Rep. Andrea Salinas. Photo by Gia Goodrich
“While OFRI has used tax dollars to debunk science and mislead the public, the Oregon Department of Forestry has been short-staffed on basic monitoring and climate change positions,” notes Salinas, whose amended bill now aims to reform and restructure the agency, and deflate it with a giant budget slash—redirecting those cut funds to support conservation efforts under the Oregon Department of Forestry.
The bill originated in the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee. One committee vote and several public hearings later, it’s scheduled for another vote in the House Revenue Committee, likely happening on Thursday (May 27).
MORE: The secret power of old growth
The next stop is the House for a full floor vote. Then on to the Senate.
“It would reflect very poorly on the ability of the Oregon Legislature to respond to damning evidence of malfeasance at a state agency if they failed to hold OFRI accountable this session,” says Sean Stevens, executive director of Oregon Wild, a nonprofit dedicated to protecting and restoring the state’s wildlands, waters and wildlife.
An audit of OFRI requested by Gov. Kate Brown following investigations into the agency’s misconduct is being handled by the Oregon Secretary of State’s office and will likely remain undetermined until after all congressional voting is done on the “OFRI bill.”
The bill faces an uncertain future, but a hopeful and growing one according to proponents.
“I have heard a united voice that the state of Oregon in its funding should not be in the business of timber industry public relations,” said the bill’s co-sponsor, State Sen. Jeff Golden (D-Ashland) to ProPublica. “People want a change in that. That’s really struck a chord.”
Jordan Rane is an award-winning journalist whose work has appeared in CNN.com, Outside, Men’s Journal and the Los Angeles Times.



























